Torvalds unplugged
Is that a specialized implementation of Linux or is it going to be an
option?
It's probably going to be an option. It's actually a very well defined
specialized kind of interface. It's probably going to be part of the 2.5
series.
There's a cycle time between new kernel releases which is quite high.
Do you plan to do something to reduce that?
I try very hard and it's really hard to do. I was intentionally aiming to
be very aggressive with 2.4 because I knew that it was going to slip. But,
by being very aggressive, if it slipped then I would still be shorter than
if I were not. Now it's been close to a year and a half and it's going to
be another two months at least. Even if I'm really happy I just have to
release a final test and let it sit for a while. It's getting closer and
closer to two years and that's a long time. Realistically it's fairly hard
to do it in a much shorter time. I think a year is what you should aim for
but it's probably not going to be possible in practice.
Are you going to do anything to ensure that the Linux gets easier to
use?
I'm more into the hardcore kernel development. We do things like that
[plug and play]. To me it's very important to have easy to install
hardware so the kernel will just find it automatically and configure it so
you don't have to. That's important because especially PC's there's just
so much hardware that it's very hard to configure unless it's done
automatically for you. In the end most of these kind of end-user, easy to
use stuff on the desktop will be easy to do.
Are you taking any clues from FreeBSD/BSD?
There's been a lot of technology sharing. More than technology sharing,
there has been the same kind of competition, as between Linux companies. I
think it has been very important to have competition between Linux and
BSD, and Linux and NT too. Just the fact that Mindcraft numbers showed us
to be lacking in certain areas was very motivational. That's how a lot of
the 2.4 improvements came to be. The same is true of the BSD system. It's
been kind of a benchmark by which you judge yourself. That's something
that has been even more important than some of the technology sharing that
has been going on.
Is it only a benchmark issue or is there also a license issue?
I'm talking benchmark in a more wider sense. A number of issues, we always
want to be better than anyone else whether it's BSD or anyone else. It's
- « first
- ‹ previous
- of 10
- next ›
- last »